Divorce and Elective Share: Is My Soon-To-Be Ex Entitled to My Estate If I Die?
The answer: Yes, maybe. Your soon-to-be ex could very well have the legal right to claim one-third of your probate estate in South Carolina if you die before the divorce is finalized and filed. But there is some nuance to this topic, so let’s get into it.
Elective share is the portion of a deceased spouse’s probate estate that the surviving spouse is entitled to regardless of the terms of the will, as we’ve covered before. It protects surviving spouses from being unknowingly disinherited.
In South Carolina, the only reasons a surviving spouse would lose that right are:
- Missing the deadline to file a claim
- Signing a valid waiver (read more on our blog here)
- Divorce
Divorce is where it can get tricky. Intent to divorce does not extinguish an individual’s right to elective share, nor does filing for divorce. So, then, exactly how and when does divorce affect the right to spousal elective share under state law?
That’s what we’re looking at today, along with the reasoning of the Supreme Court of South Carolina in Deborah Weeks v David Weeks (2024) (here) which affirmed that intention doesn’t matter – only the letter of the law does.
Weeks v. Weeks (2024) Brief Background
Deborah and James had a “stormy” relationship after they married in 1998. Deborah initiated many actions in family court over the years, and several temporary orders were issued – no final orders – but all actions were dismissed in 2012.
James and Deborah were still married at the time of his death in 2017. His 2001 will left everything to his two children from a previous marriage. Deborah filed for elective share.
The probate court disallowed her claim, and upon appeal the circuit court affirmed the probate court. But the South Carolina Court of Appeals and later the Supreme Court reversed the lower courts and found in favor of Deborah, favoring a plain reading of the letter of the law.
How Divorce Affects the Right to Elective Share in South Carolina
South Carolina courts have routinely protected and upheld the right of a surviving spouse to claim elective share.
Still, there are some instances when an individual no longer has a right to claim spousal elective share: once a divorce is finalized, and in select situations as described in South Carolina Code Section 62-2-802, which directly covers how divorce and annulment affect marital rights, and Section 62-2-204, which covers voluntary waiver of rights.
The right to claim elective share is extinguished:
- Once a Divorce is Finalized
Under South Carolina Code Section 62-2-802(a), if the individual has divorced the decedent, and the two did not remarry and stay married until the decedent’s death, he or she is no longer a “surviving spouse” and is therefore not entitled to elective share.
Importantly, Section 62-2-802(c) states that “A divorce or annulment is not final until signed by the court and filed in the office of the clerk of court.”
What happens if a divorce is granted, but one spouse dies before the order is signed and filed? This exact scenario happened, as we’ve covered in this blog before. In short, in Hatchell-Freeman v. Freeman (2000), the SC Court of Appeals found in favor of the party claiming elective share, because she was still technically a “surviving spouse” under the law when the decedent died.
- Upon Obtaining a Divorce or Annulment Not Recognized by South Carolina
Section 62-2-802(b)(1) addresses situations where an individual “obtains or consents to” a final decree or judgement of divorce or annulment but that divorce or annulment is not recognized by South Carolina. While technically still married under SC law, if the couple does not “live together as husband and wife” at the time of the decedent’s death, the individual no longer has the right to claim elective share.
- Upon Marrying a Third Person Subsequent to an Invalid Divorce or Annulment
Section 62-2-802(b)(2) addresses situations where an individual has obtained a divorce or annulment that is not recognized by South Carolina but has then gone on to marry a third party. In these situations, the individual no longer has the right to claim elective share from the estate of the first spouse.
- Upon Obtaining an Order Terminating All Marital Property Rights or Confirming Equitable Distribution
Under Section 62-2-802(b)(3), an individual who “was a party to a valid proceeding concluded by an order purporting to terminate all marital property rights or confirming equitable distribution between spouses” no longer has the right to claim elective share, as long as the couple were no longer “living together as husband and wife” at the time of the decedent’s death.
- Upon Obtaining a Complete Property Settlement or Property Rights Waiver in Anticipation of Divorce
Under Section 62-2-204(b), a waiver of all rights in the spouse’s property or estate or “a complete property settlement entered into after or in anticipation of separation or divorce is a waiver of all rights to elective share” unless it provides to the contrary.
(Additionally, Section 62-2-802(b)(4) addresses instances of common law marriage, where an individual is not considered a “surviving spouse” unless his or her status as a common law spouse has been established within the time frame defined by statute.)
The Supreme Court Again Follow the Letter of the Law, Not Intent
In the Weeks opinion, the court cites SC Code Section 62-2-802 and Section 62-2-204 explicitly and shows how the statute did not apply in this case.
Deborah did not sign a waiver of elective share before or during the marriage, not even in anticipation of divorce. The orders issued were not final and were, in the words of the court, “not only temporary but ephemeral.” When James died, the two were still married and there was no pending divorce suit, final property settlement, or final order “purporting to terminate all marital property rights or confirming equitable distribution.” Under the law, Deborah was a “surviving spouse” and therefore retained her right to claim spousal elective share, even if that went against the wishes of James in his will.
The court found in favor of Deborah and affirmed her right to claim elective share. The court states, “Why the parties decided to drop their family court battle and remain married may be a mystery to others, but § 62-2-204 is not about unraveling the baffles of human affairs. It is about setting the boundaries of a surviving spouse’s rights. These rights are substantial, and the elective share statute must be construed in strict faithfulness to its plain terms.”
This approach is consistent with other decisions that rely on strict interpretation of the law, including Geddings v. Geddings (1995), Terry v. Terry (2012), Simpson v. Sanders (1994), and Hatchell-Freeman v. Freeman (2000), mentioned above.
“Sometimes the law’s boundaries do not parallel what some view as fair. The probate court, believing the fair thing to do was grant Deborah nothing, set the law aside and imposed its own idea of fairness. This it cannot do,” concludes the court.
What You Can Do Now
If you are in the middle of a divorce, what can you do? Speak with your divorce attorney and estate planning attorney to go over your options. You and your soon-to-be ex don’t have to wait until the divorce is finalized; you may be able to mutually waive your rights to elective share, obtain a complete property settlement in anticipation of divorce, or obtain a court order terminating all marital property rights.
For Help with Prenuptial and Postnuptial Agreements, Probate, Elective Share and More
Call estate planning attorney Gem McDowell of the Gem McDowell Law Group with offices in Myrtle Beach and Mt. Pleasant, SC. Gem and his team help create personalized estate plans that reflect your family’s wishes and circumstances and give you peace of mind knowing that your loved ones will be taken care of when the time comes. Gem also helps families through the probate process, from submitting the will to closing the estate, and more.
Whether you simply want to review an existing will, trust, or agreement to ensure it’s still valid, or you want to create a comprehensive estate plan, or get help with probate, call Gem and his team today to schedule a free consultation at 843-284-1021.
Can You Prevent Future Spouses from Inheriting? Irrevocable Wills vs. Public Policy and the Ward Case
Imagine your spouse dies and you discover that not only were not provided for in the will, but that their previous will specifically barred you from inheriting anything at all. What would you do?
This is what happened to Mary K. Ward. Mary was the fourth wife of Stephen Day Ward, Jr., who had an irrevocable will from an estate plan created with his third wife, Nancy. While Stephen’s will explicitly barred future spouses from inheriting anything, South Carolina statute provides for spouses left out of the will. This led to an interesting conflict: which should prevail, public policy or a valid contract?
The matter, In RE: Estate of Stephen Day Ward, Jr., went before the South Carolina Court of Appeals in 2024 (read it here), and we go into it below.
It’s a good look at how South Carolina courts view public policy and at the powers and limitations of irrevocable wills. It’s especially important if you have or have considered getting an irrevocable will.
Should You Get an Irrevocable Will? Pros and Cons
Irrevocable wills are wills that cannot be changed or amended once signed. The only exception is divorce, which typically only blocks the ex-spouse from acting as executor and inheriting anything; the rest of the will stands. (The laws regarding this vary by state; check in your state.)
Some people, often married couples, choose irrevocable wills because they cannot be changed. They want their estate plan to be carried out as originally agreed, even if one spouse predeceases the other by many years. The surviving spouse is bound by the terms of the will(s) they created together and cannot change the terms for any reason.
Advantages of an irrevocable will over a traditional revocable will:
- Guarantee the estate plan will be carried out, even after death
- Protect assets from being passed down to the surviving spouse’s new partners, spouses, or stepchildren, or other potential heirs
- Prevent the surviving spouse from being pressured into changing terms of will
We do not draft irrevocable wills here at our law firm – neither irrevocable joint wills (one document for two or more people) nor mutual wills (separate documents for each individual).
Why not? Because things change. Life circumstances, family dynamics, personal finances, and state and federal law affecting estate planning can change drastically, but an irrevocable will can lock you into decisions you made long ago when life was very different. Further, other tools can be used to accomplish many of the same goals. We’ll go into some of those options down below.
Finally, there are no guarantees, even with an irrevocable will. Which leads us to the Ward case.
The Irrevocable Wills and Estate Plan of Stephen and Nancy
In 2013, Stephen Ward married for the fourth time, to a woman named Mary. They did not create an estate plan together during their marriage, and Stephen did not take any action with regards to the will he executed during his third marriage to wife Nancy.
Stephen died in 2016. Under the terms of his will, Mary was barred from inheriting anything.
Mary then sought, through her daughter, to be declared an omitted spouse. As an omitted spouse, she would be entitled to the share of Stephen’s probate estate that she would have received had there been no will at all, which is 50% under South Carolina’s intestacy laws.
Stephen’s children (the Appellants), acting as his co-personal representatives, disagreed that Mary should receive an inheritance. That’s because Stephen and Nancy had executed an estate plan together in 2005 which barred any future spouse from inheriting anything.
The Terms of the Estate Plan with Third Wife Nancy
The estate plan, which included Stephen’s irrevocable last will and testament (the Will) and an agreement for mutual wills and trusts (the Agreement), worked with interlocking provisions to ensure their wishes were carried out in this manner:
- After one spouse died, his or her assets would “pour over” into a trust controlled by the other
- After the death of the other spouse, the remaining assets would be dispersed among Stephen’s and Nancy’s children
These terms are quite common among couples. The Agreement contained the following terms regarding re-marriage, too:
4.2 If he or she remarries after the death of the
Predecessor, he or she will:
4.2.1 Thereafter ratify his or her Will and
Trust in the form and with the provisions
contained in his or her Will and Trust
annexed hereto; and
4.2.2 As a condition of such re-marriage,
require any person he or she re-marries to
legally and unconditionally waive his or her
right to an Elective Share in the Property
provided to them under S.C. Code Ann.
Section 62-2-201
Stephen did not carry out the terms of the Agreement after his marriage to Mary to ratify the will or to have Mary waive her right to elective share.
The matter was heard in probate court and circuit court before eventually going before the Court of Appeals of South Carolina.
The Four-Part Test for Omitted Spouses
Did Mary qualify as an “omitted spouse”? To settle the matter, the court looked to a four-part test it previously established in Green v. Cottrell (2001), which essentially turns the relevant statute (SC Code Section 62-2-301) into a checklist:
“A surviving spouse who wishes to qualify as an ‘omitted spouse’ must demonstrate:
- The decedent spouse executed the will in question prior to the marriage;
- The will does not provide for her as the surviving spouse;
- The omission was unintentional; and [sic]
- The decedent did not provide for the spouse with transfers outside the will.”
The first two points: undisputedly true.
Point #3: “Hotly disputed.” The court states that had Stephen executed the documents required by section 4.2 of the Agreement – namely, ratifying the Will and Trust and having Mary sign a waiver of elective share – the Appellants would be in a better position to argue that the omission of Mary from the Will was intentional. Since he didn’t, the court agrees with the probate court that the omission was not intentional.
(It’s worth noting that witnesses at the earlier trial testified Stephen said he still intended for his estate to be handled as described in the Will, and that getting married would not change that. However, the “Dead man’s” statute, SC Code Section 19-11-20, generally prohibits witnesses from providing testimony about conversations with the deceased if they would stand to benefit from it.)
Point #4: Also “hotly disputed.” Brian Ward, one of Stephen’s children, testified in probate court that Mary had received several things during the marriage and after Stephen’s death, including a leased Toyota Camry, a timeshare in Las Vegas, the $17,000 capital percentage from a local club membership, and approximately $13,000 in total. The Appellants argued that these assets were a transfer outside of the will. The court disagreed, saying the value does not approach what Mary would otherwise have been entitled to from an estate valued in excess of $900,000.
The court found that Mary was an omitted spouse under this test.
When a Valid Agreement and Public Policy Clash
“South Carolina treats with great deference a testator’s intent in disposing of his or her property,” says the SC Court of Appeals. Yet it also acknowledges that sometimes a testator’s intent may conflict with public policy.
In this case, there’s no dispute that the Will and the Agreement, which would bar Mary from inheriting anything, were valid. This directly clashes with South Carolina’s protections for surviving spouses from being unknowingly disinherited (read more about elective share) or from being omitted entirely (read more about omitted spouse), which is considered a matter of public policy.
Ultimately, the appeals court AFFIRMED the circuit court and the probate court, which had said that allowing “blanket” provisions to overcome an individual’s statutory rights to the omitted spouse’s share violated public policy.
Alternatives to Irrevocable Wills for Asset Protection
As stated above, we do not use irrevocable wills here at our firm. We use other estate planning tools to accomplish the same goals.
- Life estate deeds allow a surviving spouse to live in the home but ensure the home is passed to a different heir upon the spouse’s death
- Irrevocable trusts remove assets from probate estate altogether
- Testamentary trusts created by the will upon the death of the testator
- QTIP trusts provide income to surviving spouse while reserving assets for children
- Prenuptial or postnuptial agreements to waive elective share
These are just some of the options available. Speak with an estate planning attorney in your state about the right options to achieve your goals.
Personalized Estate Planning
Does your current estate plan reflect your family’s wishes? Are you as protected as you could be? For help creating, amending, or reviewing your estate plan, call Gem McDowell today. He and his team at the Gem McDowell Law Group help individuals and families in South Carolina create comprehensive, customized estate plans that help protect assets, preserve good family relationships, and provide peace of mind. Schedule your free consultation today by calling (843) 284-1021. We have offices in Myrtle Beach and Mt. Pleasant, SC, and are looking forward to speaking with you.
What Is an “I Love You” Will and Is It Right for Me?
An “I love you” will is a common type of last will used by spouses. It’s a reciprocal will where the language is exactly the same in each spouse’s will, except that the names are flipped.
In a typical “I love you” will, each spouse leaves their entire estate to the other, then, if their spouse predeceases them, to their children. If both spouses die at the same time, their estate passes to their children.
This type of will is a simple and straightforward way to help avoid Family Malpractice™ and direct how the family’s estate should be handled after the death of one or both spouses. It’s a great choice for many families but not all. There are some important considerations, including how much you and your spouse trust each other.
Here’s what to know.
An “I Love You” Will is Not the Same as a Joint Will
While both types of wills are most often used by spouses or couples, there are some important differences between the two.
First, a joint will is one single document shared by two people. More importantly, a joint will is very restrictive. If one spouse dies, the surviving spouse is bound by the terms of the will and cannot change them, even after major life events like remarriage. (Some states allow for a joint will to be revoked, but the process can be difficult.)
In contrast, each spouse has their own distinct will with an “I love you” will. This is important, because it means an “I love you” will is much more flexible. A surviving spouse may keep the will as is (which would then leave the estate to the children), amend it, or replace it with a new will entirely.
At our law office, we don’t draw up joint wills and we don’t recommend them for anyone. An “I love you” will is the better choice between the two, providing more flexibility for the future.
However, it’s not right for everyone.
An “I Love You” Will Might Be Right for You If…
This type of will might be right for your family if you and your spouse:
- Have no children or only shared children (i.e., no stepchildren)
- Are on the same page about how your assets should be handled after death
- Trust each other
An “I Love You” Will Might Not Be Right for You If…
This type of will might not be a good choice for your family if you and/or your spouse:
- Have children from a previous relationship (where a “Brady Bunch” will for blended families is a better choice)
- Don’t agree on how assets should be handled after death
- Have large amounts of debt
- Have an addiction or overspending problem
- Are in a situation that could put the assets at risk
- Don’t trust each other
Trust is Key with an “I Love You” Will: Issues to Consider
On this last point, it can be difficult to face the reality that you don’t fully trust your spouse to make good choices regarding your estate after your death. But it’s worth thinking about what could happen.
For example, one client had us write up her will, but she didn’t leave her entire estate to her husband without restrictions. She suspected he might start dating after she died and give away some assets to his new girlfriend – and that’s exactly what he tried to do. Knowing him, she had used her will to protect some assets and keep them in the family. She used a certain type of trust to essentially “handcuff” him, allowing access during his life to some of her assets while preserving the rest for the children.
Another point to consider: An individual has the right to change their “I love you” will while both spouses are still alive. This could lead to an uneven situation where one spouse leaves everything to the surviving spouse in the will, but the other spouse doesn’t. The individual changing their will has an ethical obligation but no legal obligation to inform their spouse of the changes.
Finally, you must also trust that your spouse will not spend or squander the assets and leave nothing for your children, if that’s important to you. If your spouse has issues with addiction, gambling, or overspending, leaving them all your assets could not only be detrimental to your children, but to your spouse as well.
Maybe your spouse doesn’t have an addiction or spending problem but has a lot of debt or suffers from a serious medical condition that’s expensive to treat or is in a profession (like doctor) that’s likely to be sued. These are scenarios where the estate’s assets could be at risk of being spent with nothing remaining to leave to the children.
Ask yourself:
How would you feel if your spouse remarried or dated after your death and gave your assets away to a new partner or child(ren)?
How would you feel if you found out your spouse had changed their will without telling you, and your wills were no longer reciprocal?
How would you feel if your spouse spent everything on addiction, shopping, or debts, leaving nothing for your children?
There is no right or wrong answer to any of these questions. But you and your spouse should seriously consider them before deciding to move forward with an “I love you” will.
Do You Have the Right Will for Your Family?
You can see how the apparently straightforward “I love you” will can quickly become complex. This is where it’s helpful to work with an experienced estate planning attorney who can bring up potential issues and scenarios you might have never thought of. An “I love you” will is just one type of will, and maybe a different kind of will is a better choice for your family. An experienced estate planning attorney can help you figure it out.
Whether you’re getting a will for the first time, updating an old one, or simply want to review an existing one to ensure it still aligns with your priorities, we can help. Gem and his team at the Gem McDowell Law Group help individuals and families across South Carolina create wills and comprehensive estate plans that reflect each family’s unique circumstances and wishes while avoiding Family Malpractice. Schedule your appointment or free consultation at the Myrtle Beach or Mount Pleasant, SC office by calling 843-284-1021 today.
The Omitted Spouse: When the Spouse is Left Out of the Will
What happens if you leave your spouse out of your will? Or your spouse leaves you out of his or her will?
This happens more often than you think. Many couples get married after one or both partners already executed a last will, meaning the new spouse has been unintentionally left out.
But that doesn’t mean the surviving spouse receives nothing. The law provides for the omitted spouse so that he or she is not unintentionally disinherited.
What the Omitted Spouse is Entitled To
Under South Carolina Code section 62-2-301, an omitted spouse is entitled to the same share of the testator’s estate that would have been received had the testator died without a will.
South Carolina intestacy laws determine the share of inheritance in such cases. If the testator dies with no children, the spouse inherits everything (i.e., all the assets subject to probate). If the testator dies with a spouse and children, the surviving spouse is entitled to 50% of the estate. The remaining 50% is divided according to the terms of the will.
The omitted spouse does not automatically receive the assets but must claim his or her share within a certain time frame.
When the Omitted Spouse Provision Does Not Apply – Spousal Elective Share
The purpose of the omitted spouse is to provide for a spouse left out of the will unintentionally.
But what if the spouse was left out of the will intentionally?
Under the same law cited above, if it appears that the omission was intentional or if the testator provided for the spouse through transfers outside of the will, then the omitted spouse provision does not apply.
The surviving spouse may still make a claim for elective share, however. A surviving spouse is entitled to one third of the testator’s probate estate in South Carolina even if the testator intentionally left the spouse out of the will. That’s because the only way to legally disinherit a spouse in South Carolina is to have both partners knowingly sign a waiver of elective share. (Read more about disinheriting a spouse and spousal elective share here on our blog.)
The Solution: An Intentional and Current Estate Plan
Laws regarding omitted spouses and elective share have helped many people who would otherwise have been disinherited. But having a purposeful, up-to-date will and estate plan is better than relying on the law to carry out your wishes.
For help with last wills, trusts, powers of attorney, and other estate planning documents, call estate planning attorney at the Gem McDowell Law Group. Gem and his team help individuals and families in South Carolina create estate plans that take into account unique circumstances, carry out personal wishes, and give peace of mind.
Whether you’ve never had an estate plan drawn up before or your existing plan is in need of a review, Gem and his team can help. Call today to schedule a free consultation virtually or at the Myrtle Beach or Mt. Pleasant, SC, at 843-284-1021.
